National corruption watchdog on election agenda

Labor has pledged to legislate for a “powerful, transparent and independent” National Anti-Corruption Commission with the powers of a standing Royal Commission by the end of the year if elected.

Anthony Albanese speaks at a media conference on April 16 2022.

Prime minister Scott Morrison said at the last election that the government would establish a similar body, but the promised Commonwealth Integrity Commission is yet to materialise.

If elected, Labor would legislate for an ICAC this year, Opposition leader Anthony Albanese said over the weekend, describing the matter as urgent.

“That’s why we will legislate it this year. In 2022, we will get this done, because we’ve waited long enough,” he said.

Asked whether he would introduce an ICAC in his next term, Mr Morrission told reporters on Saturday that it remained the government’s policy.

“Yeah, I would, I would seek to implement that … that is our policy and we have a detailed plan,” said.

However, he rejected the NSW model.

Mr Morrison said he remained very critical of similar bodies in other states, particularly in NSW, which he said had driven out one of the nation’s best premiers in the form of Gladys Berejiklian.

“The model in New South Wales is not a model that I would support federally,” he said.

The PM said the only reason legislation had not yet come before the parliament was because Labor didn’t support the government’s plan.

Broad investigative powers

Mr Albanese said the NSW ICAC had held corrupt politicians to account regardless of their political flavour, which was a ‘good thing’.

He said Mr Morrison had not only failed to act on his promise to set up an ICAC that was made four years ago but had walked away from doing anything to progress it In his current term.

Labor says its proposed watchdog would operate with all the independence, resources and powers of a standing Royal Commission into serious and systemic corruption in the federal government and the ALP has been working with Australia’s preeminent legal and integrity experts to develop design principles.

Labor’s Commission will: 

  • have broad jurisdiction to investigate Commonwealth ministers, public servants, statutory office holders, government agencies, parliamentarians, and personal staff of politicians
  • carry out its functions independently of government, with discretion to commence inquiries into serious and systemic corruption on its own initiative or in response to referrals, including from whistleblowers and complaints from the public
  • The Commissioner and any Deputy Commissioner would serve for a single fixed term, have security of tenure comparable to that of a federal judge and be overseen by a bipartisan Joint Standing Committee
  • have the power to hold public hearings
  • be empowered to make findings of fact, including a finding of corrupt conduct, but not to make determinations of criminal liability.

Mr Morrison described Labor’s plan as a ‘two page fluff sheet’.

He said the government had developed more than 300 pages of detailed legislation for an ICAC but Labor didn’t agree with it, and any legislation needed the support of the parliament to get up.

The government’s proposed integrity watchdog has been criticised by the Centre for Public Integrity which said in a paper released last year that it would be the most toothless in the country.

Unlike state and territory bodies the proposed Commonwealth Integrity Commission would not be able to scrutinise the influence of people outside the public service on government, hold public hearings, accept whistleblower complaints, make findings or report publicly, the paper said.

Comment below to have your say on this story.

If you have a news story or tip-off, get in touch at editorial@governmentnews.com.au.  

Sign up to the Government News newsletter

One thought on “National corruption watchdog on election agenda

  1. Real Progress towards a real ICAC style body would certainly make those who advise Government s and those in Ministerial positions feel very uneasy.
    But would actually help Government to win back the trust of the People and move towards a more fairer and equitable playing fields for any grants and public infrastructure investment.
    But this level of change is up to who we, as a nation vote for!

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required