By Julian Bajkowski
Opponents of Constitutional recognition for local government have accused the federal minister leading the multi-party push for a â€˜yesâ€™ vote of trying to buy the referendum result by giving $31.6 million to supporters and just $500,000 to opponents of direct funding for councils.
Conservative dominated group â€˜No Power Grabâ€™ claims that the latest round of referendum funding for the â€˜yesâ€™ and â€˜noâ€™ camps amounts to a â€œcorruption of Australian democracyâ€ because the pro-change camp is being given â€œ65 timesâ€ the amount of funding as those opposing change.
â€œThe only reason the Federal government can give this money is because they changed the Referendum Machinery Act â€¦ to suspend limitations on the Federal government spending money on political referendum campaigns,â€ Vote No spokesman Tim Wilson said.
â€œThis is a corruption of our democracy to buy a change in the Constitution with taxpayerâ€™s funds that limits the power of Canberra politicians and bureaucratsâ€, Mr Wilson said.
Mr Wilson said that local communities â€œwill be worse offâ€ if the Constitution was amended. A core argument of the â€˜Noâ€™ camp is that direct funding for councils will encourage unfettered pork barrelling of local government projects because existing powers of states governments over council funding will be bypassed.
A number of Coalition held state governments including West Australia, Victoria and New South Wales have grizzled about the potential dilution of their powers, but Campbell Newman led Queensland has remained an active proponent of Constitutional recognition.
However the momentum of the â€˜Vote Noâ€™ camp is picking up speed as it harnesses widespread suspicion in the community of a change that both the government and councils have struggled to make an issue in the media because of the strong focus on Laborâ€™s internal factional warfare.
Yesterday Prime Minister Julia Gillard directly appealed to councils to engage in a grass roots campaign to sway electors to vote â€˜Yesâ€™ saying that agreement between governments was not enough.
Local government minister Anthony Albanese went one step further and accused the â€˜Noâ€™ camp of stirring up â€œconspiracy theorists”.
The government says that the distribution of funding is based on how the votes to have a referendum fell in the Parliament.
â€œThe proposed amendment has strong bipartisan support at the federal level. Federal Members of Parliament voted 134 to 2 in favour of changing the Constitution to recognise local government,â€ Mr Albanese said in a statement.
â€œTo promote public discussion of the proposed amendment, the Government will provide funding to proponents of the â€˜Yesâ€™ and â€˜Noâ€™ cases to assist them to take their cases to the community.
â€œThe amount of funding to be provided for each case will reflect the proportion of Members that voted for and against the Constitution Alteration (Local Government) Amendment Bill 2013. Over 98 per cent voted for and less than 2 per cent voted against this bill,â€ Mr Albanese said.
Mr Albanese also suggested that the â€˜Noâ€™ camp is getting more money that it would ordinarily be entitled to.
â€œWhile the â€˜Noâ€™ case would attract less on a strictly proportional basis, the Government will provide up to $500,000 to proponents of the â€˜Noâ€™ case. The two Members who voted against the bill will be asked to determine the distribution of this funding,â€ he said.
Read former Howard government Finance Minister Nick Minchinâ€™s opinion piece on the Vote No case.
Comment below to have your say on this story.
If you have a news story or tip-off, get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Sign up to the Government News newsletter