Health service CEO misused position

A former CEO of a Victorian regional health service misused their position in awarding a contract worth almost $1 million to a consultancy, a corruption probe has found.

IBAC Commissioner Robert Redlich

The former CEO was in a relationship with the director of the consultancy, idenitified only as “Company 1”, at the time and the contract was awarded without a competitive procurement process.

Under the terms of the contract, work undertaken by Company 1 for the agency included booking flights and accomodation, selecting furniture, coordinating the AGM, buying gifts for board members and publishing the annual report.

The agency, identified in the report as “Agency A”, provides acute care, residential aged care, disability services and community services for regional communities.

But Victoria’s Broad based Anti Corruption Commission (IBAC) says the former CEO exploited weaknesses in the system for his own financial gain and that of close associates.

IBAC’s report on Operation Meroo says the former CEO also authorised payment of invoices to an electrical company owned by a relative – “Company 2” – several years after the work was claimed to have been done.

That included the payment of invoices to their relative’s company between 2012 and 2015 totalling around $74,000 for work purportedly undertaken in 2004, without verification.

High-end restaurants

The former CEO also inappropriately splashed out health service funds on travel and hospitality, IBAC found.

The report says there were “multiple instances” where the former CEO and associates dined at a high-end Melbourne restaurant between 2010 and 2015, charging the expenses to Agency A.

One of these meals cost $772 and included oysters, lobster, brandy, a $90 bottle of wine and a $30 tip.

The former CEO said most of the dinners were for entertainment related to their role as CEO.

An external financial review of entitlements ordered by Agency A claimed by the former CEO found expenses totalling more than $300,000, including travel, accommodation and meals.

Dodgy travel expenses

IBAC also concluded that the former CEO claimed travel expenses although the primary purpose of the travel was personal.

In 2009, the former CEO visited a hospital in Bangkok, purportedly to tour the medical and accommodation facilities and study patient care management.

The cost of the trip came to around $20,000, and included business-class flights, five star hotel accommodation, a sight-seeing tour, a game of golf and a $656 lobster dinner.

The report, tabled to parliament on Friday, found the health service board failed to govern effectively or oversee the CEO, and had a culture that discouraged employees from speaking up.

IBAC also criticised the then Department of Health and Human Services for not acting despite red flags about the former CEO, who has since resigned from the agency.

Warning to health services

IBAC Commissioner Robert Redlich says the failure of the former CEO to separate work-related and personal financial matters came at great cost to the health service.

“The health service’s Board did not act in the best interests of the agency as it failed to scrutinise the former CEO’s expenditure and did not hold the longstanding former CEO to account. The Board’s inadequate oversight helped facilitate the former CEO’s conduct,” he said.

Mr Redlich said the problems highlighted in the investigation aren’t unique.

“There are 81 public health services and public hospitals in Victoria,” he said.

“I urge public health services and other public sector agencies, particularly in regional or rural areas and those governed by boards, to consider the corruption issues outlined in the Operation Meroo special report and consider how they can mitigate these risks in their own agencies.”

Comment below to have your say on this story.

If you have a news story or tip-off, get in touch at  

Sign up to the Government News newsletter

5 thoughts on “Health service CEO misused position

  1. Where are the checks and balances? Those who processed the invoice payments – particularly those made 8-11 years after the expenses were allegedly incurred – should have raised red flags. Were staff who did not question the dodgy payments and expenses aware of the accountability requirements re their positions? Are they still employed? I assume that IBAC became involved following a Public Interest Disclosure. I hope that person/s were rewarded rather than penalised for their actions.

  2. I work for this health service and it makes my blood boil that our residents have to put up with furnishings and decor that is well over 30 years old and in disrepair. We have tried to update but are repeatedly told ‘there is no funds’. So unfair!

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required