Governments must collaborate on bioenergy: report

The Commonwealth could generate regional jobs and reduce waste by stimulating Australia’s bioenergy sector, a new analysis says. 

The bioenergy sector offers a $3.5 to $5 billion investment opportunity for Australia, mostly in regional economies, while reducing waste and improving the country’s energy security.

That’s according to the Bioenergy State of the Nation Report, produced by Bioenergy Australia and KPMG, which provides the first assessment of the opportunities in bioenergy and the criteria for how government can support the sector.

Bioenergy, which can be in the form of electricity, heath, liquid fuels or chemicals, is generated from biomass such as wood, agricultural products and waste from councils and industrial sources.

Bioenergy Australia says the sector delivers benefits including employment and economic development of rural and agricultural communities, energy security, utilisation of waste streams and a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.

The new report is based on a survey undertaken by Bioenergy Australia to quantify activity in the Australian bioenergy sector. KPMG used that data to evaluate 222 operating bioenergy plants and 55 projects either under construction or at the feasibility stage.

More than three quarters of the operational bioenergy projects were in Queensland, NSW and Victoria, the analysis shows.

Bioenergy Australia CEO Shahana McKenzie said that what differentiated Queensland as a clear leader was that it had identified bioenergy as a huge opportunity for the state.

She added:

“Their policy objectives are better defined and more aligned to the bioenergy sector compared to other states and territories, with strong evidence of advocacy of the benefits and opportunities from bioenergy.”

Queensland was driving the bioenergy agenda on a number of fronts, with the State Government rolling out new projects through the Biofutures Roadmap and Biofutures Program, Ms McKenzie said.

Internationally, the report found Australia is in the bottom quartile for bioenergy contribution globally, placing 19 out of 24 OCED countries reviewed.

Ms McKenzie said there was a host of global approaches identified in the report that Australia could adopt – from committed targets for renewables to investment support and renewable heat incentives.

The report points to Sweden’s landfill ban for organic waste and the US’s loan guarantees for the establishment of biorefineries.

Actions for Australian government

The report argues that the Commonwealth could work with the states and territories to grow the Australian “bio-economy” by establishing policy objectives and targets, as well as a national roadmap including policy levers for all levels of government.

Australia’s performance in achieving the roadmap’s targets would be monitored and regularly reported, under the report’s proposals.

“A national roadmap reflecting the unique attributes of each state and territory will allow the identification of their respective needs and comparative advantages,” the report says.

“Some jurisdictions may have feedstock that allows them to become a leader in biofuel refining or generating dispatchable electricity from biomass or producing biochemicals.”

Different policy levers can be used to support the development of the bioenergy sector, the analysis says.

“These range from explicit targets on the use of bioenergy, such as the E10 biofuel mandate in Queensland and NSW, to government grants to reduce project capital costs and contracts‑for‑difference, which guarantee a price for electricity generated over a defined time period.”

Understanding the available levers to the market is an important step towards identifying strategies for the development of the bioenergy sector in Australia, the report says.

While bioenergy policy levers such as gate fees and capital grants have been implemented in some jurisdictions, a consistent, national approach is currently lacking, it concludes.

Comment below to have your say on this story.

If you have a news story or tip-off, get in touch at  

Sign up to the Government News newsletter.

One thought on “Governments must collaborate on bioenergy: report

  1. This article ignores the development CSIRO of hydrogen from solar and wind which
    have zero emissions when used with a fuel cell with 80% efficiency. Why?

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required