Desperately seeking general managers for NSW super councils

Mike Baird dogs2
A doggedly determined Mike Baird. Pic: Facebook.


General managers of NSW councils slated for mergers have been asked to send in their CVs if they want to be part of an interim council, as State Premier Mike Baird doggedly advances his plans to chop 40 of the state’s 152 local councils.

Deputy Secretary of the Department of Premier and Cabinet (DPC) Simon Draper wrote to GMs last week asking them to flag their interest in applying for a 12-month interim role on new, larger councils by April 13, despite the fact that general managers are not employed by the state government but by the councils they work for.

The government did not provide any details about salary, job description, contracts or performance management but promised to provide these “in due course.”

“Once expressions of interest (EOI) are received they will be evaluated and this may lead to further assessment and evaluation process,” said the letter.

The Department previously asked councillors to do the same thing, giving them until April 15 to respond.

The new roles on interim councils are likely to start around June 2016, although local government elections for merging councils are in March 2017. New councils generally get the choice to ratify appointments or make another.

Mr Draper requested a CV and a two-page covering letter from general managers and asked that they answer two questions:

1. What approach have you taken in the past to lead significant organisational change?
a) What key outcomes did you achieve and b) how did you lead and consult with staff?

2. Service continuity is crucial during change. What, in your experience, are the key ingredients to delivering successful service continuity and improvement at a time of change?

Local Government NSW President Keith Rhoades said he was “totally appalled” by the state government’s gambit.

“They (general managers) don’t work for the government. They were not employed by the government, they were not employed by the minister,” Mr Rhoades said. “They have contracts. They are employed by councils.”

Local council general managers are normally entitled to 38 -week’s salary when their contracts are terminated, meaning the bill could easily tip into the millions.

GMs at the helm of the smallest Sydney councils pull in around $220,000 a year. Captains of larger councils, like Blacktown, North Sydney and Manly earn about $320,000 a year, rising to as much as between $440,000 and $473,000 for GMs at the largest Sydney councils such as Parramatta, Liverpool and City of Sydney.

Mr Rhoades said: “You can bet your bottom dollar that the tab will be picked up by ratepayers, not the government, even though they’re the ones making the decisions. The government is dictating who will and who won’t work in local government.

“It’s decision making on the run. You just don’t know what’s next. They have just lost control of it.”

The letter comes as the council merger process remains in a state of flux with reports not yet finalised by delegates in charge of public inquiries into mergers and the Boundaries Commission yet to hand down its recommendations to NSW Local Government Minister Paul Toole.

Local Government Professional CEO Annalisa Haskell said the organisation had written to the Department requesting an extension to the 13 days general managers had been given to apply.

Ms Haskell said: “They only got 13 days to respond, which was a lot shorter than councillors and they have been given limited information which is concerning.”

She added that she was exploring the implications of the EOI for general managers.

Council amalgamations have become a living nightmare for the state government.

There are 45 different merger proposals currently on the table – some of them directly clashing – and two councils have mounted a legal challenge to the government’s authority to force mergers under the Local Government Act.

Ku-ring-gai Council heads to the Supreme Court tomorrow (Tuesday) in an attempt to force the government to release the full KPMG report on council mergers, which has been the government’s primary source of justification for the mergers but only partially made public.

Meanwhile, Liberal councillors and MPs in a number of blue-ribbon Liberal seats have loudly voiced their objections to the process, many opting for outright rebellion against the government.

Comment below to have your say on this story.

If you have a news story or tip-off, get in touch at  

Sign up to the Government News newsletter

2 thoughts on “Desperately seeking general managers for NSW super councils

  1. If you always do what you’ve always done you’ll always get what you’ve always got. What about the people not currently in local government who would make much better General Managers of Super Councils?

    1. If the fictitious people you refer to have never been in local government, it is absurd to say that they would make “much better” General Managers. You may as well say that a person who doesn’t swim would swim faster than one who has been swimming laps for years. Yeh, right.
      In any event, you are missing the point. It is undemocratic, and the General Managers are not employed by the State Government. If you think that it is okay to break the rules, think of it like this – your fictitious person gets the job as General Manager and is then sacked without notice, doesn’t get a reference, and can’t prove that he or she even worked there. Try and see it for what it actually is.

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required