Court clash as hold-out councils try to sink Baird’s mergers


Three NSW regional councils will square off against NSW Local Government Minister Paul Toole in the Land and Environment Court at 11am  today in a desperate bid to prevent themselves being forcibly amalgamated with other councils.

Walcha, Oberon and Cabonne Councils have joined forces in an attempt to reverse the government’s bid to merge them with other councils.

Oberon is slated to merge with Bathurst Council and there is also a proposal to merge Cabonne with Blayney Shire and Orange City Councils.

Although Premier Mike Baird has backed away from sandwiching together Walcha and Tamworth, a merger between Armidale-Dumaresq, Guyra, Uralla and Walcha is still on the cards that the government has said it supports “in principle.”

Barrister Peter King is expected to argue that the state government has used the wrong part of the Local Government Act to pursue mergers, the part of the Act designed for voluntary mergers, not forced.

He is also likely to argue that there has been a denial of procedural fairness. This could include the state government’s refusal to release the full KPMG report, which provided the basis for the government’s contention that mergers will save $2 billion over the next 20 years, and whether the public inquiry process and consultation with ratepayers was fair.

There is a lot riding on the case. If it goes the wrong way for the government the judgement could provide ammunition for other councils taking legal action over the forced mergers, including Woollahra, Botany Bay, North Sydney, Ku-ring-gai, Hunters Hill and Mosman. Nine merger proposals are being held up by legal action.

Whether a council win – which would be appealed by the state government in a federal court and could end up in the Supreme Court – could wind back Governor David Hurley’s proclamation of 19 new councils earlier this month is debatable.

There has been speculation that the government’s haste to proclaim these new councils, which began operating on Monday last week, could be based in the desire to beat any court judgements which could have stymied the process.

This time it’s personal

These particular regional council mergers are hyper sensitive political territory for the Liberals for several reasons. Walcha Council is inside Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce’s federal seat of New England, where he faces a strong challenge from Independent candidate Tony Windsor, and Mr Toole’s state seat of Bathurst takes in Oberon.

Barnaby Joyce on stage singing a Walcha rendition of Queen’s “We are the Champions.”

It’s personal in more ways than one for Sydney barrister Peter King too, who is working the case pro bono.

His family come from Walcha and Mr King was the Liberal member for Wentworth until Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull rolled him in an acrimonious preselection battle in 2004.

Mr King ended up standing against Mr Turnbull as an independent, earning himself a ten-year ban from the Liberal Party (for standing against a preselected candidate) in the process and re-joining the party only last year.

The barrister also sat on Woollahra Council and was Woollahra Mayor in 1990-91. Woollahra Council is one of the fiercest opponents of the council mergers and the first NSW council to commit to legal action.

More legal headaches for Baird and Co

Meanwhile, Lane Cove Councillor Scott Bennison had a potentially important victory last week when he managed to score some cabinet-in-confidence draft documents in a challenge in the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT).

The documents revealed more about the modelling KPMG used to arrive at the projected $2 billion the government said it would save over 20 years from merging councils.

They showed that the assumption of 3 per cent annual savings for metropolitan councils and a 1.5 per cent saving for regional councils were based on council mergers in Auckland in 2009 and Toronto, Canada in 1998, not more recent council amalgamations in Queensland in 2008 or those closer to home in Victoria in 1994.

It is expected that NCAT will direct the government to release more information in the coming weeks.

Comment below to have your say on this story.

If you have a news story or tip-off, get in touch at  

Sign up to the Government News newsletter

2 thoughts on “Court clash as hold-out councils try to sink Baird’s mergers

  1. What about Gundagail? Mike Baird sacked Gundagai Shire Council last week. Gundagai was a democratically elected Council and they have been replaced by an unelected administrator, Christine Ferguson, who has no senior mangagement skills or experience. She was a nurse in her former life!! Gundagai has been forced to amalgamate with Cootamundra, and neither town wants this amalgamation. Everyone in Gundagai is very upset and distressed. See the Facebook page – “Save Gundagai Shire”.

    Gundagai was appealing to the Land and Environment Court this morning. What happened? Your article mentions nothing about Gundagai.

    Can you tell me what salary is being paid to Christine Ferguson? The only reason she got the job of administrator is because she is a National Party hack (the selection was certainly not based on merit), A nurse, for goodness sake!!! Totally ridiculous!!!

    Sack Mile Baird!! Sack Paul Toole!! Sack Katrina Hogkinson!!! Sack Christine Ferguson!!!

  2. This is a deliberate Attempt to undermine democracy. Regardless of how good or bad councils are they are always subject to the vote. The administrators are put into place by the liberal government.

    Once upon a time people would have reacted against such an arbitrary and corrupt exercise of power. Now the police state would chew up and undermine that action. The media would attack any debate or resistance.

    Build a casino? Welcome to the new serfdom.

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required