Sparks fly over $11m bushfire grant for skydive ‘pond’

An $11 million grant from the NSW government’s bushfire recovery fund was handed out for a skydiving ‘pond’ that would create just 15 jobs, a parliamentary committee heard.

During a heated enquiry on Monday Deputy Premier and Minister for Regional Development John Barilaro faced questioning over the allocation of its $177 million bushfire grants program.

Kempsey Shire was last October awarded almost $11.3 million from the state government’s Bushfire Local Economic Recovery Fund for a new skydiving adventure park at Kempsey Regional Airport.

The committee heard it was the second biggest single grant in NSW but would create just 15 ongoing jobs.

John Barilaro gives evidence at the parliamentary committee hearing into grants administration on February 8, 2021.

“You know what this skydiving facility is, don’t you Deputy Premier? It’s basically a pond that people land in when they skydive as well as a function centre and a rock climbing wall,” Greens MP David Shoebridge said.

“You are seriously defending, in the face of so much need, more than $11 million dollars of public money going to build a pond so that people can land in it? How does that relate to bushfire relief?”

That question was followed by a heated exchange.

Mr Barilaro retorted: “You’re the one calling it a pond.”

Mr Shoebridge replied: “It is a pond.”

Mr Barilaro relplied:  “It’s a bit more than a pond, Mr Shoebridge. Council put this project forward because they believe in it. It’s not up to me to judge.”

Mr Barilaro went on to defend the grant saying the project would stimulate economic activity and met the criteria for funding.

“We were investing in projects in that were shovel ready to stimulate those economies that were impacted by bushfires to stimulate jobs,” he said.

“It met criteria and it was also about immediate jobs and driving tourism.”

Mr Barilaro also defended the decision to provide $10 million for the Visy paper company which is owned by billionaire Anthony Pratt.

Mr Barilaro said the investment has shored up 1,200 future jobs.

“If Visy was to fall over tomorrow … the impact is long term,”  he said.

Blue mountains ‘didn’t meet funding criteria’

Mr Barilaro was also asked to explain why the bushfire grants were given out to predominantly government-held seats, and why LGAs like the bushfire-ravaged Blue Mountains missed out.

Mark Greenhill

Of the 71 projects that received funding, only three were in Labor electorates, the committee heard.

“It really looks on the face of it that pretty much all of this funding has ended up in government seats,” Labor MP John Graham said.

Mr Barilaro said 90 per cent of buildings damaged in the fires were in coalition seats while 77 per cent of overall impact was borne in coalition seats.

Mr Graham asked why the the Blue Mountains got nothing despite being the 12th worst affected LGA in the country and putting up 23 projects for funding.

Mr Barilaro said the criteria included the number of buildings damaged.

In the case of Blue Mountains the number was 109. In comparison 2,057 were impacted in Eurobodalla Shire while Bega Valley had 1,970 affected.

He said the Blue Mountains would be top priority in the next round of funding for $250 million that closed on January 28.

“With the Blue Mountains the projects they put up didn’t meet the criteria,” Mr Barilaro said.

“We’re working with them and they’re our priority out of the next round of $250 million.”

But for Blue Mountains the second chance could be too late.

“Our CEO submitted a formal prospectus for over twenty grants for programs across our city ranging from post-bushfire programs, a fire station upgrade and stimulatory projects that would help boost economic activity,” Mayor Mark Greenhill told Government News.

“These submissions were carefully thought-out and would have assisted our community.  They were shovel-ready projects.”

Cr Greenhill said Council was never informed why their submission was unsuccessful.

He urged the government to reconsider its original funding decision.

“The second round of funding will come close to 18 months after the bushfires. It will be too late for many Blue Mountains businesses.”

No problem with John ‘Pork-Barrelaro’

Mr Barilaro said he didn’t have any role in decision making around the $250 million Stronger Communities fund which distributed $141 million to coalition seats in a move that’s been widely condemned as blatant pork barrelling.

However he said he had no problems being dubbed ‘John Pork-Barrelaro’.

“The scale of regionally based funding I have fought for has earned me the title of ‘Pork-Barrelaro’,” he said.

“It’s a name that I’ve never distanced myself from because I’m actually proud of what it represents and that is the investment I’ve fought for for regional NSW.

“Do I like being called ‘Barrelaro’? No but what it represents is the investment, and I’m proud of that.

“… You want to call that pork barrelling, you want to call that buying votes? That’s what elections are for.”

Comment below to have your say on this story.

If you have a news story or tip-off, get in touch at  

Sign up to the Government News newsletter

2 thoughts on “Sparks fly over $11m bushfire grant for skydive ‘pond’

  1. This COALition Government has made the stealing of government funds to carry out election vote buying a part of political life so when there is a change of government we can expect this to be usual but we can expect the Murdoch press to run lead lines of horror on the basis that they expect the public to forget John Pork-Barrelaro. The corruption of political life has reached a new height with this government so it not hard to understand why the young voters are so apathetic about politics

  2. One of the issues we face in Qld is the approving of grants for so-called “shovel ready” projects. This means that if you didn’t get the Inner Circle of Mates’ nod early in the piece, you were well & truly behind the eight ball when the time-sensitive application process begins. Grants awarded under the Dept of Tourism, Innovation & Sport (or whatever they are this week) are not apparently all made public & the successful applicants – if sufficiently motivated to stay below the radar – are claiming that this info is “commercial in confidence”. Really? Isn’t this taxpayers’ funds? Wouldn’t the Dept & the recipient crow about their good fortune? Apparently not. One case evident at the moment involves the Growing Tourism Infrastructure Fund. If you are a mate of someone high up in the local council, just write your own meal ticket. Details available upon request. A shame an e-mail & phone contact with the Dept did not result in any info – RTI lodged today. Will be interesting to see if council provided sponsorship or letter of support as our councillors are in the dark. Hot on the heels of the manipulation of the Minutes of the previous council ordinary meeting which record words not actually uttered (I can understand the Minutes containing less than what was said, but more? Come on!). Also, at the same meeting, a conflicted councillor handed the chair to another conflicted councillor to handle the first one’s declared conflict – and then made the casting vote to allow him to stay in the meeting!….and the first councillor then voted on the item with which he had a declared conflict, even though the motion to allow him to stay in the discussion given his vast wealth of knowledge did not contain and approval re voting. Complaint lodged with the CCC & also the OIA – no doubt these will be tick & flick NFA as both organisations are under-funded, under-resourced and under-motivated.

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required