A new planning pathway opened to developers in New South Wales this week.
Launched in December by Premier Chris Minns, the Housing Development Authority is now welcoming expressions of interest. Proposals will be reviewed monthly meaning EOIs will be considered on an ongoing basis.
Before a proposal is recommended as a State Significant Development project, the department will assess it against criteria that meet the objectives of the EOI process:
- identify high-yield housing proposals by focusing on known high-yield types of residential accommodation
- identify housing projects that can be assessed and constructed quickly by focusing on more compliant, major housing proposals that can commence construction quickly
- drive quality and affordable housing by focusing on housing development proposals that are well-located, have enabling infrastructure and contribute to affordable housing supply
- complement the State Significant Rezoning Policy by providing a potential pathway for major housing proposals that are seeking concurrent rezoning.
Headed by the secretary of the Department of Planning Kiersten Fishburn, secretary of the Premier’s Department Simon Draper and Infrastructure NSW CEO Tom Gellibrand, the independent body will sit within the NSW planning department to fast-track approvals.
A statement released from the office of the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces reads: “This new assessment pathway will reduce the number of large complex development applications councils are required to assess each year, freeing up resources for councils to assess less complex DAs faster.”
The HDA has the ability to approve or reject residential developments worth more than $60 million in Sydney and $30 million in rural and regional areas of NSW, therefore bypassing council scrutiny altogether.
“Developers will now run our communities, not residents.”
When announced, the news shocked councils across the state. “We were working collaboratively to improve the planning processes and ensure the voices of our communities are heard as part of any reform. Instead, without any warning, the premier has moved the goalposts and dropped this bombshell,” said then president of Local Government New South Wales, Cr Darriea Turley.
Removing councils from the process means removing the community’s voice, Turley said. “It will give developers a clear run to propose their own height limits, density and green space settings – it means that developers will now run our communities, not residents.”
The government’s proposal will put communities in jeopardy, she added. “This new pathway will deliver windfall gains for developers and worsen congestion, create over-crowding and remove the safeguards that protect communities from inappropriate and ad hoc development.”
When Minns broke the news of the new authority, he expected a backlash. “I’m sure some people will push back against it, but we’re making this call because we don’t have any time to waste,” he said, adding: “For over a decade in NSW, governments have made it harder to build the homes we need, not easier – but this cannot continue if we want to be a city that young people can afford to live in.”
LGNSW called on the Minns Government to listen to all communities, not just developers, in addressing the housing crisis. “Come back to the table and work with local government, not against us.”
I’m a builder and have constructed some small speculative development over the years.
I therefore feel my opinion is one that looks at the overall value to all stakeholders objectively.
I agree that additional housing is required and needs to happen sooner rather than later. However, I have grave concerns that removing council and in turn removing communities’ opinions from the decision making is a huge mistake.
Allowing developers to set the benchmark, with the idea that one shoe fits all, is obviously dangerous and will without doubt create multiple issues if it were to become a reality.
Each area or suburb, street to street have very different requirements for housing, consideration of bushfire evaluation, surrounding infrastructure, endemic flora and fauna, heritage significance and so on, can not be placed under a single umbrella.
I feel there needs to be inclusion of sensible feedback from council and community groups to ensure the local issues are considered.
I also feel that both council and community groups cannot have a NIMBY attitude towards the importance of creating additional housing along with amenities and infrastructure.
Say goodbye to heritage and heritage conservation areas. The entire character and fabric of local communities will be lost in Sydney and will be turned into one huge Meriton sprawl
This is the email I sent to Parramatta council.
Parramatta council start a lottery for the 5,000 Parrahub units located within Lansdowne, Inkerman, Boundary and Church streets but do not increase the height limit until after all the property is bought so as to avoid protest.
https://youtu.be/za3pZto7OB4
Parrahub 30.000 space carpark on your phone.
https://app.sketchup.com/share/tc/northAmerica/ZX8eVeqUb14?stoken=yMvdbGorHmsCQu86dLWcDyDh-0aNRnckALEK8vq28snhqur9VeeEqtC56VMLdEf7&source=web
Parrahub 5,000 units above on your phone.
https://app.sketchup.com/share/tc/northAmerica/Kbi3S4skIM4?stoken=NuDrCu7WAsTo3ZrlT6Dz4SwEjlQcgC-sacdypfIAODSzVxwG_J4mqOYbdnIyc8JT&source=web
https://youtu.be/za3pZto7OB4
It seems that we have not learned from the past. Well in a way that actually makes the wider NSW community better off. The shady days of Landcom, who ran planning, for profit. Where planning was neither long term or strategic. Just a card game, the players of which sat in corporate offices, nothing to do with sustainability or seeking to limit the effects on our fragile environment. Seems the new HDA aim is not development that works for residents, both current or future. Simply another abdication to some corporate interests. Not necessarily even Australian corporate interests given the $60 or $30 million lower limit.
Hence a statement released from the office of the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces reads: “This new assessment pathway will reduce the number of large complex development applications councils are required to assess each year, freeing up resources for councils to assess less complex DAs faster.”
You’ve done it again – despite the evidence before us, handed over control of desperately neeeded housing to the “developers”. Tragically up and down the coastal strips of Australia is housing development inappropriate for both the local environment and housing needs. Sustainability and affordability are out the door when control goes to developers who will only target highest return potential, not what is needed socially, economically or environmentally. City dwelling politicians who live in a bubble, lack innovation, whilst the developers have all the control, tax benefits and laugh all the way to the bank. (30 YEARS in the building industry)