A new planning pathway proposed by the NSW government will sideline councils and deprive the community of a voice, says the local government peak body.
Under the government’s proposal – announced on Friday by premier Chris Minns – a state-led planning authority will bypass local councils and have the ability to approve or reject residential developments worth more than $60 million in Sydney and $30 million in rural and regional areas of NSW.
A new body – the Housing Development Authority – will sit within the planning department to fast-track approvals. Three public servants will head the HDA: secretary of the Department of Planning Kiersten Fishburn, secretary of the Premier’s Department Simon Draper and Infrastructure NSW CEO Tom Gellibrand.
News of the planning overhaul – which has shocked councils across the state – was high on the agenda at the Local Government NSW annual conference in Tamworth this week.
“There were already a number of planning-related motions on our business paper and we expect that the state government’s bombshell announcement on Friday will now feature prominently in discussion,” LGNSW president Darriea Turley told Government News.
Indeed, a priority motion was carried by members on Monday formally condemning the planning overhaul. The unanimous move was one of the first items of business at the LGNSW conference.
When Minns broke the news of a planning overhaul while delivering the Bradfield Oration, he was expecting a backlash. “I’m sure some people will push back against it, but we’re making this call because we don’t have any time to waste,” he said, adding: “For over a decade in NSW, governments have made it harder to build the homes we need, not easier – but this cannot continue if we want to be a city that young people can afford to live in.”
In a statement released in response, LGNSW said: “Today the premier has handed property developers an early Christmas present at the expense of every community in NSW, by sidelining councils and communities from the planning and assessment process.”
In the statement, Turley said councils are in shock over the government’s plans. “We know full well there is a housing crisis, and we honestly thought we were working with the state government in good faith to address it. We were working collaboratively to improve the planning processes and ensure the voices of our communities are heard as part of any reform. Instead, without any warning, the premier has moved the goalposts and dropped this bombshell.”
Removing councils from the spot rezoning process means removing the community’s voice, Turley said. “It will give developers a clear run to propose their own height limits, density and green space settings – it means that developers will now run our communities, not residents.”
The government’s proposal will put communities in jeopardy, said Turley. “It’s not just about amenity, it’s about the liveability of our communities – not just for us but for generations to come. This new pathway will deliver windfall gains for developers and worsen congestion, create over-crowding and remove the safeguards that protect communities from inappropriate and ad hoc development. It also completely undermines community trust in planning.”
LGNSW called on the government to listen to all communities, not just developers, in addressing the housing crisis. “Come back to the table and work with local government, not against us.”
So private houses worth more than $60m (there are a number of them in Sydney) will no longer need a DA?
So this is how the ‘planning system’ created by State Government is fixed is it? Local government and their communities are made to look inept and are unfairly punished for the egregious delays by State Government public servants that sit on referrals for many months and even years. (The worst example I am aware of was a straight forward Planning Proposal that was mired for 865 days with NSW Planning.)
Meanwhile, factors that are significantly driving the housing crisis are getting insufficient attention e.g. massive under delivery of public housing; lack of appropriately skilled labour to design and deliver stock; difficulties with sourcing increasingly expensive materials; failure to understand that developers are not attracted to locations where they will not make at least a 20% profit no matter how close they are to public transport nodes. Market failures go a long way to explaining the gaps between growth targets and DA lodgement volumes.
And when the HDA assesses high value applications, how will communities be compensated for the major impacts on infrastructure and the significant increases in service demands that they generate?
Removing councils from the spot rezoning process means removing the community’s voice, “It will give developers a clear run to propose their own height limits, density and green space settings – it means that developers will now run our communities, not residents.”
Another concession for the Developer Lobby, there is no question which side the Minns Labor Government is on and its definitely not the side of ordinary residents. If this proposal has the intention of speeding up housing projects as Minns suggests then it will have the opposite effect on affordable housing, it will fuel more speculation in the property market and force up prices further out of the reach of those who most need cheap housing. If Minns really wants to make a dent and improve affordable housing supply then the Government needs to return to a policy of taking responsibility and build public housing. I for one won’t hold my breath because Labor & Liberal Governments have both embraced Economic Rationalism and leave everything to the Corporate Market.
Sadly the outcome will be people living in new ghettos. Fast tracked; not solving the underlying planning issues. The downside of years of urban sprawl isn’t going away. Just creating another social disaster to add to it. Real planning needs to happen where multiple agencies work together. Not as announced, where an arbitrary body doesn’t need to be accountable for the social disasters they make. A great way to drop NSW and greater Sydney further down the list of liveable cities. No accountability was the curse of the previous NSW governments’ housing shambles.