Former Aus Post CEO launches attack on chairman

Former Australia Post CEO Christine Holgate has launched an extraordinary attack on its chairman, saying he lied, misled a senate enquiry and abandoned her to a firestorm in the wake of the Cartier watches scandal that ended her career with the government enterprise.

Christine Holgate

In a submission to the senate inquiry into Australia Post Ms Holgate claims that on October 22 last year she was “humiliated” in parliament and “unlawfully stood down” by Australia Post Chair Lucio Di Bartolomeo after it was revealed she had gifted four $5,000 watches to senior executives.

Ms Holgate also accuses Mr Di Bartolomeo of misleading a subsequent senate inquiry on November 9 in relation to his knowledge of a BCG review of the government owned enterprise.

Ms Holgate says she was “treated like a criminal by my own chairman” to the extent that she was forced to seek mental health care and medication.

“The experience the Chair of Australia Post and others put me through – which continues – should never be allowed to happen again, not just at Australia Post, but in any organisation, to any person, in any role,” she says.

“I was deliberately isolated and continue to be, despite the clear findings and evidence that I have done nothing wrong.”

Watches decision ‘legal and approved’

Ms Holgate defends the decision to purchase the watches the four senior managers, saying they were given as rewards to recognise their work on the company’s Bank@Post service.

She says the purchase of the watches was legal, within both Australia Post policies and her own signing authority limits, and signed off by auditors. The decision was also widely celebrated within the organisation, she says.

“Yet somehow, I was forced out of my job over it. For this, I blame one person- the Chair, Lucio Di Bartolomeo,” she says.

“He knew all of the facts but chose to stand aside from his responsibility to defend me and Australia Post, from those who didn’t know all of the facts. He then lied about his actions and about other important issues.

“It is unacceptable that the Chair of a major public-owned enterprise can mislead the Senate over his knowledge of something as important as a review of the organisation commissioned by the government.”

Ms Holgate defends her record a senior executive both in the private sector and with Australia Post, saying in she had been able to reduce waste, improve revenue and profitability and enhance culture.

She said had broken her silence on the matter in the interests of accountability and building a stronger and more capable board.

Chairman denies claims

In a statement issued on Wednesday, Mr Di Bartolomeo defended his conduct and denied Ms Holgate’s claims, including that she had been unlawfully stood down.

Lucio Di Bartolomeo

He said Ms Holgate had agreed to stand down on October 22 and later advised him of her resignation on November 2.

“The Board did not stand down, or suspend, Ms Holgate from her role – that being an unnecessary consideration given her agreement to stand aside,” he said.

He also said Ms Holgate had been offered extensive support through Australia Post’s employee assistance program.

The 150 page missive will be examined at a senate hearing next Tuesday and Mr Di Bartolomeo said he looked forward to providing the inquiry with responses.

Labor’s spokeswoman on communications Michelle Rowland said the submission highlighted the failure of the Australia Post board to uphold due process in the face government pressure.

“Everybody knows that if (Prime Minister) Scott Morrison and (Communications Minister) Paul Fletcher did not want Ms Holgate gone, the Chairman and Board would have acted differently,” she said.

She accused the Government of running a “protection racket” for the board of Australia Post which she said remained a “dysfunctional swamp of Liberal party hacks”.

Comment below to have your say on this story.

If you have a news story or tip-off, get in touch at  

Sign up to the Government News newsletter

2 thoughts on “Former Aus Post CEO launches attack on chairman

  1. This is a typical claim by somebody not understanding the principles of public monies accountability. Or even understanding the public perception test of what is correct and morally acceptable of a person in such a senior role.

    The public purse is not available for such generous gifts for individuals for simply doing the job they were hired to do and for which they are generously remunerated for in their salary.

    If Ms. Holgate wished to provide such generous gifts she was always able to do so by personally gifting the watches after paying for them from her own money. Australia Post is a very large public entity, so where would such gifting stop when using the public purse? You never hear of a front line worker receiving such a generous and expensive reward for simply doing their job.

    This case clearly demonstrates how out of touch senior managers are with societies expectations and norms, not to mention their own internal procedures. I cannot accept Australia Post’s Accounting Procedures and Guidelines provide her the scope to approve such a purchase, it is most certainly not the case with the NSW government. The Federal government would appropriate public money using very similar provisions.

  2. Phew! we don’t have a Commonwealth Integrity Commission CIC with the powers to get to the bottom of this issue. Our politicians can be so thankful that CIC doesn’t exist.

    The whole issue of Government owned enterprises. and the workings of Public sector rules on these enterprises. where there is no tax payers moneys directly involved.

    So the perception of justice Can be politicised without a watchdog getting to the point. Instead we have to have a senate committee to look into what CIC would have seen too.

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required