Federal CIO quits amid shake-up

By Julian Bajkowski

The odds of a major policy shake-up in central technology strategy for federal agencies have shortened dramatically after the long-anticipated resignation of whole-of-government chief information officer Ann Steward.

The revelation of Ms Steward’s departure from both the Department of Finance’s Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO) and the Australian Public Service comes just a week after Communications Minister Stephen Conroy revealed that the future of government technology policy had been put on the Cabinet table under a forthcoming ‘Digital White Paper’.

Ms Steward has indicated she will depart by the end of 2012.

The vacation of her position clears the decks for a consolidation of disparate policy and administrative functions that have made it difficult for Canberra to deliver service delivery and productivity gains now occurring in the wider community and the private sector.

While a delivery date is yet to be set for the delivery of the government’s new technology manifesto — a thinkpiece that both subsumed the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet’s delayed Cyber White Paper and then broadened its focus to include benefits from the National Broadband Network — the policy will have to be finalised well ahead of an election.

A clear option for the government is to return the role of wider government technology strategy setting to Senator Conroy’s Communications, Broadband and Digital Economy portfolio where it sat prior to the abolition of the National Office of the Information Economy under the Howard government in 2004.

A key constraint to AGIMO’s effectiveness has been its location within the Finance portfolio where it has been structurally incapable of instituting higher-level policy reform while being required to prosecute unpopular cost-cutting mandates.

At the same time AGIMO’s reputation was not helped by the hiring of UK cost cutting guru Sir Peter Gershon whose initial review did not factor-in disruptive technology industry shifts like cloud and mobile computing.

A key part of Senator Conroy’s takeover of the Digital White Paper includes the creation of a national cloud computing strategy that has been sanctioned by Prime Minister Julia Gillard.

While Canberra may be struggling with cloud computing, local governments are quickly adopting the strategy as a way to preserve infrastructure and data.

In Queensland local governments have invested in their own cloud services following severe flooding.

Comment below to have your say on this story.

If you have a news story or tip-off, get in touch at editorial@governmentnews.com.au.  

Sign up to the Government News newsletter

0 thoughts on “Federal CIO quits amid shake-up

  1. Crikey, there’s some confusion in this piece!

    First, I reckon hearty congratulations are in order to Anne Steward for the fine work she has done over the last 7 years. Julian, you are churlish not to have done that!

    Even a quick review of the AGIMO website shows the extent and depth of work Anne has led, not just in implementing the Gershon recommendation, but establishing a pretty comprehensive set of frameworks covering the governance, management, development, procurement, deployment etc of ICT systems and investments. While aimed at government agencies, any organisation would be well-served by following the guidance achieved.

    Secondly, while AGIMO will always be branded by the $2B in cuts made to agency operational spending following the Gershon report, this must be recognised for the important achievement it is: all organisations — governments especially — must reduce the ratio of operational ICT spending to enable the sorts of innovation being spoken about here. I doubt this could ever have occurred outside of, or without strong support from, a Finance ministry (or the CFO function of a corporation).

    For all the above reasons, Anne’s achievements should be recognised, and the critical, ongoing need for this type of agency within finance/treasury functions acknowledged. These types of reform need teeth!

    A Digital/Cyber White Paper, and broader “digital economy” policies, are something quite different to the policies and processes that shape and direct the way governments manage their own use of digital systems. Yes, such policies and processes should be INFORMED by broader national digital policies, but to attempt to put them together as some co-creation concept creates inevitable conflicts of thinking, and interests, within government agencies.

  2. Argus I have to agree with your overall comments this is a very dangerous article in misleading people to the facts.

    I also think criticism of Sir Peter Greshon is insulting particularly given his recommendations for commercially of the shelf application for eProcurement in Government which still appears to be on the back burner. Spend to save!

    Understand the topic perhaps or risk setting things back even further.

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required