Aerotropolis must provide for a new hospital, report says

The NSW government should secure land within the planned Aerotropolis to build a future hospital so expected population growth in western Sydney can be met, a report recommends.

Sam Sangster

There have been no details of the proposed airport city’s health infrastructure so far, and a parliamentary committee has heard criticism that planning for the region’s growing health needs is lagging .

The committee’s report into health services in south west Sydney, tabled on Monday, considered whether a new hospital should be built in the South-West Sydney Growth Region as part of the Aeropropolis land use deal.

It stops short of saying a new hospital should be built immediately, but recommends the government takes step to secure land within the Aerotropolis precinct.

“It is the view of the committee that the NSW government must place itself on the front foot with respect to making sure land is secured for a strategic site to accommodate a future health facility near the new Badgerys Creek Airport,’ the report says.

“To this end the committee recommends that the NSW government, as part of its planning for the new Aerotropolis, identify the most strategic site for a new hospital near the Western Sydney Airport, and preserve land in the event that a new hospital needs to be built in the future.”

The NSW Nurses and Midwives Association, the Health Services Union and the Western Sydney Leadership Dialogue have all backed the idea.

“On sheer projected population numbers there certainly is a strong case to start planning now for a whole new hospital and even entire health precinct within the SWSGR,” The Western Sydney Leadership Dialogue submitted.

HSU Secretary Gerard Hayes called a new hospital a “no brainer”, while a submission from the Campbelltown and Camden Hospitals emergency department said a new hospital will have to be built to need the needs of the Aerotropolis.

Focus ‘should be on existing services’

However Keith McDonald, CEO of the South Western Sydney Primary Health Network, said the focus should be on improving existing services rather than building a new hospital.

“Rather than focusing on capital investment in another greenfield site for a new hospital, it is our view that better value will be achieved by enabling and fast tracking … predictive risk modelling … interoperable information and communication technology … and embedded systems and tools that support data linkage and patient tracking across sectors,” he said.

Western Parkland Councils, representing eight Western Sydney councils, also said the focus should be on upgrading existing facilities.

“Future planning should not take priority over the need to address the current deficit in established hospitals and healthcare services or the cost and service benefits of upgrading these,” it submitted.

In evidence before the hearing in July, the Western City and Aerotropolis Authority said its role was to look at the land use with a focus on  maximizing jobs and economic development.

“It is not for us to determine the health needs, CEO Sam Sangster said.

“Once the health needs are determined we can then work with landowners and others to help understand where they may go”.

Questioned about criticism there had there had been a “lag” in the development of a health precicnt in the Aerotropolis, he told the committee a  potential health hub was being considered for the area “and we are now working with NSW health looking at what that would actually look like”.

Historic underfunding

The report says that more must be done to address what it found was historical under-funding from successive governments of health services in South-West Sydney.

It also found longer waiting times than in metropolitan areas, longer travel times , challenges recruiting and retaining medical staff and shortages of medical equipment and services.

“It is clear that the burgeoning population and complex needs in the area has placed strain on existing services, and this has an impact on workloads and morale of the health workforce.”

Source: Current and future provision of health services in the South-West Sydney Growth Region

The report says figures from NSW Health show the total annualised expense budget per resident for South-West Sydney between 2112-2018 was one of the lowest in Sydney.

“The total annualised expense budget per resident for South Western Sydney LHD ($1,714), in 2017-18 was markedly lower than other LHDs such as Nepean Blue Mountains ($1,967), Central Coast ($2,323) and Sydney ($2,497),” it said.

Government figures also indicated that the number of medical practitioners per head of population was significantly lower in South-West Sydney than most other parts of Sydney, and even the state average.

 The report also calls for a review of the funding methodology for Local Health Districts and fast tracking of site selection for the new Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital.


Comment below to have your say on this story.

If you have a news story or tip-off, get in touch at  

Sign up to the Government News newsletter

One thought on “Aerotropolis must provide for a new hospital, report says

  1. A repeat of the 80’s model for Health planning!

    1980″s saw Westmead Health and then the Research precinct came along. It was a site repurposed to meet a initial need and scope for some future development. But it too was never clearly thought through.

    “It is not for us to determine the health needs, CEO Sam Sangster said.
    “Once the health needs are determined we can then work with landowners and others to help understand where they may go”. ”

    History allows us to see that this health planning model has significant flaws.

    Residents in the suburb, an those adjoining to Westmead Hospitals and allied precinct .
    Have to deal with this planning failure each day. rather than planning for Population growth the system
    The model seems to be only worry about the outcome of chronic overcrowding and massive wait times. when the death toll from shortcomings in Health Infrastructure planning are seen as $’s lost to the economy.
    So then we hastily build another wing or extra buildings on an exiting site.

    But because this is not part of the areas initial planning, the surrounding infrastructure continues to take the strain of more services and extra people in a ever decreasing livable location.

    Infrastructure stress from operation of health establishments is never accounted for by NSW Health. As, its a council problem.
    So we travel the well warn pathway to infrastructure obsolesce!
    Essentially a long term devaluing of quality of life and also the surrounding community assets.

    We know and have planned to create a massive population the location of the Western City. We have planned :The Aerotropolis, Nancy Bird airport, Western metro, these are known and All planned. But we don’t actually plan a hospital for the site.

    We know that existing Health service are not able to keep pace within the existing Hospital locations within the Greater Sydney region too.
    So, Our Health infrastructure planning model seems to be the same flawed one from the 80’s

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required