<

Main Menu

Community groups call for Toole’s head over council mergers

12565378_1554946641494566_1079263575792098489_n

Premier Mike Baird receives the message.

 

A new community petition calling for NSW Local Government Minister Paul Toole to either resign or be sacked has started doing the rounds of affected local government areas as rebellious councils and ratepayers try to stare down State Premier Mike Baird’s controversial plans to axe 40 of NSW’s 152 councils.

With the public inquiries done and written submissions due to close on Monday February 28, a steady flow of angry public meetings and demonstrations against forced council mergers is continuing as the Baird government works towards its aim government of having arrangements in place by mid-June 2016.

The latest online petition, signed by 127 people so far, accuses Mr Toole of having contempt for the sector he is supposed to represent, “by continuing to bully and manipulate communities, council staff and elected representatives.”

The rise of the social media groundswell comes as the State Government continues with it’s paid advertising campaign that [paints the current systems of local government as broken and antiquated.

 

Paul Toole Rally

Bringing it home: protesters at Paul Toole’s office.

The petition calling for Mr Toole’s head says he has not presented enough evidence to justify why councils should be merged, that he intentionally held back most of the KPMG report used to justify forced mergers, ignored the risks of mergers and fabricated stories about councils being broken and heavily in debt.

“His work is sloppy and shabby,” says the petition on CommunityRun. “All the amalgamation proposals he has presented are deeply flawed documents full of serious inaccuracies which are clearly evident.

“Genuine improvements and reforms of the local government sector can be achieved but not through forced council amalgamations and not with Paul Toole as Minister for Local Government.

“Minister Paul Toole does not have the confidence of the people of NSW. Minister Paul Toole and the forced amalgamation process should be dumped.”

Phil Jenkyn from Save Hunters Hill Municipality Coalition said the meetings, petitions and demonstrations were “designed to continue to turn the screws on the government, which is what’s happening right across the state.”

“The bush is just ballistic,” Mr Jenkyn said.

 

Hunters Hill Community Rally

On Tuesday night, a rally at Hunters Hill Town Hall drew a significant crowd and a long succession of speakers each had a minute to voice their love for Hunters Hill and sang traditional songs.

On Thursday locals gathered at Avalon Surf Club to watch a peon to Pittwater LGA entitled: “Pittwater … going, going gone.”

A community rally at Leichhardt, in Sydney’s Inner West attracted a crowd last weekend.

With the are expected to continue over coming weeks, it is understood a number of federal Coalition politicians are becoming increasingly concerned contaminant from local government issue could spill over into a looming Federal Election campaign in Coalition held seats as voters seek to send a message through whatever means available.

Two key elements are fuelling resentment. One is a strong perception that the consultation was largely railroaded from the start. The second, and potentially more damaging, is that larger councils will necessarily become more disconnected from the community and are unlikely to be any more efficient in terms of finances and processes than existing councils.

In December voters in the blue ribbon Liberal seat of North Sydney delivered a stinging 13 per cent swing away from the Coalition in a federal byelection necessitated by the resignation of former Treasurer Joe Hockey, although Liberal candidate Trent Zimmerman still won the seat by a comfortable margin, with Labor not fielding a candidate.

 

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to Community groups call for Toole’s head over council mergers

  1. allan brown February 26, 2016 at 9:28 am #

    The nsw community’s and there residents have been misled by the present NSW Government who are unable to produce any evidence of financial benefits to any one about their plans.

  2. Robert Mc February 26, 2016 at 10:09 am #

    127 people. Probably 120 of them are councillors or council staff.

    Very few in the community are concerned about this proposal. Many, including me, support it strongly as a means to strengthen council professionalism. The days of hobby councillors and local yocal staff should have finished years ago.

    I hope the Baird Govt stares down this blatant self-interested noise.

    • Katrina Blomfield March 8, 2016 at 8:49 pm #

      What absolute rubbish!! You obviously live in the city where some Council amalgamations will not have an impact on people’s lives. I live in a small rural town that has an area population of just over 3000 people. 700 (more than 20% of our population) attended the public hearing in our town. We already have nearly 2000 signatures on our petition against amalgamating our town. Our council area covers over 6700 sq kms and we are going to be forced to amalgamate with an area that has a population of over 60,000 people. Our local council works for the people of our district as well as with them, is non-party political, is inclusive, listens to its ratepayers and is profitable. In a forced amalgamation, we will get NO representation, no service and our town will lose population as has happened to nearly all the small towns who have been amalgamated with large regional centres. Our district is totally different both climatically, geographically and in community interests compared to the regional centre we are being forced to amalgamate with. It will take some of our residents over 21/2 hours by car one way to do business with the new regional council. Building inspections, Roads & Maritime Services, road maintenance etc etc will become a nightmare. The NSW Govt has not provided ANY EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE THAT AN AMALGAMATION WILL PROVIDE BENEFITS FOR OUR RATEPAYERS AND WE REFUSE TO LIE DOWN AND LET AN AUTOCRATIC GOVERNMENT HAVE SUCH A DETRIMENTAL IMPACT ON OUR LIVES!!!!!!!

  3. Richard March 5, 2016 at 4:17 pm #

    I intend to remind the State government about democracy at the next election. Leave Pittwater alone. 90 percent favour the status quo. This is thuggery.

Leave a Reply

CAPTCHA Image

*

CLOSE
CLOSE