Aged care is set to move department again – for the second time in two years.
While Christian Porter becomes the shortest serving minister responsible for the sector, of just over a week.
In a surprise move, Sussan Ley today announced she had been appointed Minister for Aged Care, in addition to her portfolio responsibilities as Minister for Health and Minister for Sport.
Ms Ley said she “proactively put [her] hand up to bring responsibility for aged care back to health and give it a seat at the Cabinet table.”
Bringing the aged care portfolio to sit alongside the Ministries of Health and Sport would complement an integrated health system, she said.
A key theme highlighted during consultations with health professionals as Minister for Health over the past nine months had been the connection between health and aged care, she said.
Ms Ley said she looked forward to advancing the important reforms that had been progressed under former Assistant Minister for Social Services Senator Mitch Fifield.
She said that Ken Wyatt would have a specific focus on aged care in his role as Assistant Minister for Health.
Departmental move
Today’s announcement means that aged care will move from the Department of Social Services back to the Department of Health.
When the Abbott government took office in September 2013 it surprised stakeholders by taking aged care out of the health department, which ended a 15-year departmental arrangement. The Department of Health and Aged Care was first created in 1998 under the Howard government and was later renamed the Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA) in November 2001.
Some argued that transferring aged care to DSS, putting it into the same portfolio as the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), made sense as aged care was pursing a consumer-directed model while the NDIS was similarly focussed on client-centered decision making.
However, concerns around the departmental arrangement have persisted, as much of aged care’s remit – such as palliative care, dementia, infection control and wound care – concern programs and policies administered by the health department.
Many stakeholders will welcome the moving of aged care back to the health department, although there will likely be concern over the administrative and bureaucratic implications of such a large-scale move.
As Australian Ageing Agenda reported at the time, several informed observers said there was no doubt that the departmental changes had added to the normal delays seen with a change of government, which slowed down the aged care reform process (see ‘Talking Points’, AAA, Jan-Feb 2014).
A dedicated and named minister
Ahead of the most recent Cabinet reshuffle on 20 September, several stakeholders had called for Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull to appoint a dedicated minister for the sector and will likely welcome today’s surprise announcement.
However, many had argued for a minister for ageing, rather than aged care, given the issues around the ageing population had implications across a range of areas such as housing, pensions and superannuation.
The appointment of Ms Ley as Minister for Aged Care comes just 10 days after aged care stakeholders had welcomed Christian Porter as the new minister responsible for their sector.
Comment below to have your say on this story.
If you have a news story or tip-off, get in touch at editorial@governmentnews.com.au.
Sign up to the Government News newsletter
Dear Sussan Ley
Congratulations upon gaining this appointment.
A alarming percentage of young people who have the capacity to be employed, are struggling to find a job, let alone a career.
My husband wants to retire. He is currently, sixty six years of age, and diabetic. I am sixty three years of age, and in the past I could have retired at sixty years of age. Currently, it is envisaged I will be sixty five and a half years of age before securing a old age pension.
As a coeliac disease sufferer, out food bill is above average due to our dietary requirements.
I Britain, Coeliacs are given assistance with the offering of coeliac foods and other benefits.
Financially,we can not retire, this is not feasible for us.
It is rather alarming to hear existing pensioners are so dependent on the scraps of gaining a $4.00 difference due to the new government financial assistance with prescriptions, not being passed on by chemists.
This fear keeps me working. $4.00 is crucial for a pensioner! Mind boggling!
We are both employed in industries which a young person with driving skills and ability for punctuality,could be employed in.
We are holding on to our jobs, as we could not survive on the pension nor the small superannuation options we have. We have been self employed in the past, and did not have access to the government inspired employees superannuation schemes.
Look after us somewhat better in our senior years and give us positive incentives to survive on a seniors pension and benefits suitable, so we can make way for the younger generations, who with this opportunity,are capable of establishing work ethics and creating a work history in low skilled employment.
Yours Truly,
Christine Wood.